The WHO is managed by non-elected persons with diplomatic immunity, i.e. individuals who benefit from freedom from liability in relation to decisions that could potentially be harmful to people. As an example of this, we can mention Søren Brostrøm, our former Director of the Danish Health Authority, who has now been a member of WHO's global board since 2021.
Søren Brostrøm has also, since 1 August 2023, sat in the management team under the Ethiopian director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesos, who has been accused of genocide in his home country. It is claimed on the Statens Seruminstitut's website that Søren Brostrøm represents Denmark.
Shouldn't one be elected by the people to such a dignified position? Isn't it rather that he represents these global stakeholders in the WHO who pay his salary?
The WHO is thus a tool, controlled by unnamed, not elected, very rich individuals who want global control.
Approx. 84% of the WHO's funds come from private foundations and companies, such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Pharma industry, while 16% is supported by the member states.
Why do we even pay to the WHO? After all, this is really about special treatment and distortion of competition.
Should those who make trillions from emergency approved so-called vaccines be allowed to define when there is a pandemic? It could potentially also be about another alleged "One Health" crisis, including a climate crisis invented for the occasion.
The same stakeholders have a great influence on what is written and said in the mainstream media.
Where did the monopoly authority go?
And do we even have any democracy in Denmark?
At the end of May 2024, a decision must be taken on an "update" of the WHO's international agreements. Here there are plans to change WHO's role from being a guiding NGO to being a global controlling NGO with supranational powers in member countries. At the same time, the WHO will remove a passage stating that human rights must be respected at all times.
Fortunately, there are a number of countries that have already opted out of the undertaking.
In Denmark, our sovereignty is currently being negotiated behind closed doors by Sophie Løhde without public debate.
The following section was written by Dr. Meryl Nass, freely translated.
The WHO Director-General is becoming the dictator of world health unless we stop him!
The 194 member states of the WHO will vote in May on two documents that will transfer unprecedented powers to the WHO.
Here's what happens:
A new Pandemic Treaty has been proposed that would legalize the worldwide use of experimental, irresponsible vaccines, impose health censorship and more.
Major changes have been proposed to the International Health Agreements, which would give the WHO the power to impose worldwide shutdowns, vaccine requirements and much more in just a few cases of possible new viruses or bacteria.
If either passes, it will be a massive assault on our civil rights, constitutions, and our national sovereignty and individual autonomy.
• Nations will be forced to pass laws to allow the use of unregulated, rapidly produced and liability-free vaccines for future pandemics.
• WHO will be able to impose global vaccine requirements, shutdowns, quarantines and border closures.
• The WHO Director-General (who is not a doctor) will become your doctor and decide which treatments you will receive, which will be limited, and which information you and your doctor will be allowed to see.
• WHO will require nations to monitor their citizens' online activities and censor any information inconsistent with WHO's health narratives.
• WHO is building a biological warfare library: This requires nations to share "potential pandemic pathogens" (ie biological warfare agents), decode their genomes in "gain of function" laboratories and put their sequences online in public databases - almost guaranteeing laboratory spills and thereby promoting more laboratory-created pandemics.
• WHO is negotiating major changes to the International Health Agreements in secret, and we may not find out what is in them until they are adopted. Why are they secret?
• WHO has removed respect for human rights in the amendments to the new International Health Regulations. WHO believes that our basic human rights are negotiable!
• The proposed treaty gives WHO a blank check to spend on pandemic preparedness. How much will it cost? No one is saying, but one estimate suggests that WHO's budget could rise from $4 to $30 billion a year or more.
• WHO intends to enforce compliance with the agreements. National IHR authorities in each country must work with the WHO Compliance Committee and Implementation Committee to enforce compliance, and the 2 documents will be binding on each country. Here we are talking about relinquishing sovereignty.
• When will all this come into effect? The treaty will enter into force for countries that ratify it after one month, which could be as early as July 2024. The amendments will enter into force 12 months after adoption, or the end of May 2025 if adopted.
By Meryl Nass of Door to Freedom and the Sovereignty Coalition, who has much more information on what is happening and provides updated warnings on how you can act to stop this! Source: www.doortofreedom.org
Comments